Wednesday, July 01, 2009

The Struggle of Honduras to Retain it's Sovereign Constitution

There is huge contrast between the way that The Miami Herald reports the story of the Honduras government's handling of Zalaya's unconstitutional atempt to extend his reign of power, and the way that ABC News reports the same story.

Miami Herald Headline Honduras crisis shows Latin America's weaknesses. The story reports that all branches of the Honduras government opposed Zalaya's unconstitutional attempt to instate a process for his re-election - with the help of Hugo Chavez. The Miami Herald reports that The Supreme Court of Honduras order the military to oust Zalaya and to escort him out of the country. It reports that Obama stood with Hugo, Chavez, Noriega, and Castro in condemning the combined actions of the Honduras, government. Supreme court and military and called their combined actions "unconstitutional".

ABC News Headline Obama condemns Honduras coup. The article describes the coup only as "an army backed coup" failing to mention that the other branches of the Honduras government opposed Zalaya's unconstitutional attempt to extend his reign of power and that Zalaya's attempt to intitate a referendum is unconstitutional because under Honduras law only the Congress is authorized to do so.

ABC then reports that Obama declared the coup unconstitutional and goes on to say "The UN General Assembly has passed a resolution calling for Mr. Zalaya’s "immediate and unconditional" reinstatement. "

Has the government and constitution of Honduras been replaced by a world tribunal- or is this just wish fulfillment by the UN General Assembly?. Since when did the UN General Assembly have the power to weigh in on the decisions of the Supreme Court of a sovereign nation? And what ever happened to Obama’s principled stand of “not meddling” in the affairs of a sovereign nation- Obama's "principled" stand used to justify his delayed support for the people of Iran.


Jul. 1, 2009 - 8:55 AM EST
From the Website of the UN General Assembly

Joining the 20other speakers from the Americas in rejecting the coup, the United
States delegate said her country had also joined its colleagues in the Organization of American States yesterday in condemning the coup. United States President Barack Obama had also called on all actors to resolve any dispute peacefully through dialogue and free of any outside influence. Her country would continue to work through the Organization of American States to help the Honduran people.

Nicaragua’s representative urged the people of Honduras to arm themselves with courage and let the “putschists” know that their time had passed. All of America, both North and South, rejected their coup, and no more banana republics where oligarchs could continue to exploit the people with impunity existed. Although they claimed to be acting in support of democracy, they acted with bare-faced illogic that went against the region’s recent democratic history.

She particularly condemned the abduction of Patricia Rodas, the Foreign Minister of Honduras, as well as the kidnapping of the ambassadors of Cuba, Venezuela and
Nicaragua. That flagrant violation of international law was an act of aggression against each respective country that would not go unpunished

Did I read this right ? Is it true that " United States President Barack Obama had also called on all actors to resolve any dispute peacefully through dialogue and free of any outside influence"
So now the sovereign government of Honduras is the "outside influence”. It is not unreasonable to interpret Obama's words as a thinly veiled threat to the government of Honduras that if they do not accept the judicial authority of the United Nations Assembly, that there may be the use of "unpeaceful" means of asserting the collective will of the United Nations Gerneral Assembly majority, over the sovereign nation of Honduras, by the same. Isn't this "the tyranny of the (global) majority" - the same sort of tyranny that PUBLIUS provided the citizens of the United States, protection against, when they created the United States Constitution?

Obama called the murder of the Iranian people by their own government a "debate" and now he implies that the military escort or a president who is unconstitutionally trying to extend his power, ordered by the Supreme Court of a sovereign state was not a "peaceful resolution".
I saw innocent people being murdered by what Obama describes as a "debate" and no one being killed or injured, in a constitutional removal of a president in what Obama implies was an "un-peaceful" action.

What a wordsmith is our president!